|
Carlos
Fernandez Gonzales is the Vice
Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer of Grupo Modelo,
S.A. de C.V. This is a Mexican brewing company dealing with brewing related
issues. Mr Gonzales has been on the board since 1996 and acquired
significant shareholdings as the tables below indicate.

Carlos
Fernandez Gonzalez
In addition to the U.S. and Canadian markets, companies within the
agricultural sector are also looking to expand into Asia. Grupo
Modelo, a Mexican beer company that sells its products in more than
150 countries and is currently the eighth-largest beer producer in the
world, has been bullish on the Asian market for quite some time.
"Asia is a place of a lot of opportunities," says , vice
chairman and CEO of Grupo Modelo, world-recognized for their beer Corona.
"You have big markets with a lot of opportunity, as well as smaller
ones. It has everything."
Juan
Gorgallo Costa, general manager of Grupo
Minsa, one of the main players in the Mexican, Latin American, and
U.S. food markets, couldn’t agree more: "We expect the whole
Pacific Rim to be a free-trade zone, and we’ll certainly support that. I
think that Asian markets will eventually develop a taste for corn-based
products."
AGRICULTURE:
WAKING UP WITH A HANGOVER
In
1997, the recently privatized Mexican sugar industry issued dumping
complaints against U.S. producers of high fructose corn syrup (HFCS),
citing damage to sugar producers because U.S. companies were compelling
soft drink bottlers and food-processing companies to switch from sugar to
HFCS. Mexico established steep countervailing duties, as well as quotas to
U.S. HFCS producers, including AE Staley, Archer Daniels, and Cargill,
among others. As a response, the U.S. formally requested the World Trade
Organization (WTO) to intervene, with the WTO deciding that HFCS is not,
in fact, entering Mexico at dumping prices.
While according to the WTO Mexico has no reason to impose countervailing
duties on HFCS, the Commerce Secretariat has not changed its position.
Mexico did not appeal the WTO’s decision within the required 60-day
period, citing the need to evaluate the damage done by HFCS imports to the
sugar industry. Although the United States has recently relaxed its stance
somewhat to allow Mexican sugar into the market, the quantity hasn’t
been enough to appease the main Mexican players, which include Grupo
Escorpion, Beta
San Miguel, Zucarmex,
and GAM (in order of decreasing market share). Meanwhile, the conflict
continues.
The sugar dispute between the United States and Mexico is rather symbolic
of the sector as a whole, which has struggled to adapt to a market
recently opened to global competition. Of all the sectors in the Mexican
economy, agriculture is perhaps the most problematic. While total exports
have increased significantly, agriculture exports have not faired as well,
growing by only 8 percent. As federal subsidies begin to diminish, many
critics of the Zedillo administration complain that the sector has been
opened to competition too quickly. Indeed, since the Salinas years, the
industry has been steadily weaned from government support in order to
distance it from the earlier goal of self-sufficiency.
Without
a doubt, the most vital free-trade agreement for the growth of the sector
has been and will continue to be the NAFTA. To say the least, NAFTA has
created a very positive environment for Mexican agriculture producers.
Mexico enjoys a comparative advantage in the production of fruits and
vegetables, and NAFTA has facilitated access for these products into U.S.
and Canadian markets. At the same time, better access to agro-industrial
machinery and equipment have enabled Mexico’s industry to increase its
competitiveness and productivity.
Along with Mexico’s higher agricultural productivity levels resulting
from structural reforms in the 1990s, market access provided by NAFTA has
helped to boost Mexican agricultural exports to the North American region.
More than 80 percent of all of Mexico’s produce goes to the United
States and Canada. U.S. total trade of agricultural products with Mexico
has increased from US$6.3 billion in 1993 to US$10.5 billion last year.
In terms of export growth between 1993 and 1999, Mexican agricultural
exports to the United States increased 79 percent, while U.S. exports to
Mexico expanded more than 56 percent. During this period, Mexican
agricultural exports to Canada grew more than 100 percent.
Insider &
restricted shareholder transactions reported over the last two years
| Date |
Shares |
Stock |
Transaction |
| 2004-06-07 |
11,666 |
BUD |
Option Exercise
at $35.2032 - $40.17 per share.
(Cost of about $440,000) |
| 2004-02-25 |
840 |
EMR |
Purchase at $61.93
per share.
(Cost of $52,021) |
| 2004-02-04 |
8,000 |
EMR |
Purchase at
$62.0365 per share.
(Cost of $496,292) |
| 2004-01-05 |
731 |
BUD |
Acquisition (Non
Open Market) at $52.655 per share. (Value of $38,490) |
Investor
Overview Corporate
Governance Stock
Quote Stock
Chart Financial
Releases Annual
& Financial Reports Proxy
Statement SEC
Filings Archived
Earnings Webcasts Dividend
Reinvestment Plan
Dividend
History Stock
Split History Information
Request F
A Qs
Shareholder
Services Investor
Advisory
|